Thank You.
According to Malachi 4:2 this prophet is referencing Jesus as the %26quot;Sun%26quot;. But in the New testament it is referencing Jesus as the %26quot;Son%26quot;. Which one is correct?
I have found through studying that obviously the Hebrews/rabbi's during Jesus time after Jesus death have either misinterpreted what Jesus was saying or they intentionally switched what Jesus was saying. Let me explain further. Jesus stated, %26quot;I am the Light of the world%26quot;. So if someone was to ask you a literal question, %26quot;what gives light to our world%26quot;? The answer would be %26quot; the Sun%26quot;.
But don't get things twisted I'm not saying that the sun in the sky is Jesus. What I'm saying is just like african-americans uses ebonics ex: %26quot;What's up dog%26quot;, meaning %26quot;hello, or how are you doing%26quot; is the same way I am the Sun of God can be interpret as %26quot; I am the Light of God%26quot;. It's purely a paradigmatic phrase or a parable, or like modern day calls it ebonics.
Also there are other reference points in the bible whereas Jesus is referred to as the Light (Sun) of God. Here are some other scriptures:
King James Version,
a. Isaiah 60:19- 20
b. Revelation 21:23
c. John 8:12
d. Malachi 4:2
a. Isaiah 60:19 and Revelation 21:23, is giving precise evidence that in the new world there will be no sun like in our solar system, however Jesus will be the Sun (Light). As we know Light is a necessity it gives sustenance and is crucial for survival. Well this new-world (God's Kingdom / one of God Kingdoms) will not have a sun like what you see in our solar system but will be replace by a different Light. And this Light will be the Light of God, in other words the Sun of God which was obviously in Jesus, God's Spirit which is also portrayed as %26quot;Light%26quot;. (After Jesus Baptism, what was glowing or shining around him)?
Note:
Some people will debate by saying when the Hebrews wrote the bible son is %26quot;ben%26quot; and sun is %26quot;shemesh%26quot;. Which is true. Nonetheless this doesn't mean that the rabbi's and scholars of that time couldn't have changed what Jesus said from shemesh to ben. Why would they do that? Some people would ask. From my spiritual insight the only reason why I know they (rabbi's, Hebrews, scholars) would do something like that is for:
1.control
2. confusion (war between: cultures, nationality, creed, and most importantly religion)
3. greed
4. racism
5. separation
6. keep majority ignorant
7. keep majority ignorant of who they are and what they posses within
If Jesus was to come back today the Judicial system or the government would do the same thing they've done in the past. %26quot;Get rid of him%26quot;. It will hinder the order of there modern-world. It would put every thing asunder from knowing what is real and what is not. And ultimately re-teach the children of the future. Medicine would no longer be needed, relying on man's intervention would be obsolete. Just think if the True teachings of Jesus
was still in the world today there would be no wars, no racism, no hate, no pain, no medicine no need of money. Everything would be done through Love (God). No wonder they murdered him.
Peace %26amp; Love.Why did scholars switch what Jesus said, %26quot; I am the Sun (Light) of God%26quot;?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BRv9wGf5Why did scholars switch what Jesus said, %26quot; I am the Sun (Light) of God%26quot;?Son and sun cannot be misinterpretted , because in Hebrew they are completely different words, and dont even sound the same in hebrew.Why did scholars switch what Jesus said, %26quot; I am the Sun (Light) of God%26quot;?It's all connected.Why did scholars switch what Jesus said, %26quot; I am the Sun (Light) of God%26quot;?i read somewhere that the truth is god and light his shadow.Why did scholars switch what Jesus said, %26quot; I am the Sun (Light) of God%26quot;?Sorry, but you have presented no evidence that Sun was mistranslated as Son. All you have done is to show that in some places he is described as the Sun/Light of God, while other places he is the Son of God. That isn't evidence of mistranslation, that's merely evidence that he was given more than one title. Other titles include the Lamb of God, the Son of Man, and many others.
The only reason you have made this connection between Son of God and Sun of God is the similarity in the English language. Yet, in the language the books were written in, there is no similarity, so the connection doesn't exist.Why did scholars switch what Jesus said, %26quot; I am the Sun (Light) of God%26quot;?I can't give you an exact answer to your question, but there are certain words in the old and new testaments that have been incorrectly translated. i.e. in the NT the word hell is derived from the greek hades which simply means the grave. Also an obvious mistranslation is the word easter, which is translated from the greek passach, however every where else in the NT passach is the greek for passover. These are just 2 examples there are many more.
No comments:
Post a Comment